Jemele Hill knows firsthand how it feels to be scrutinized for comments about athletes. She’s been in that position before, so when LeBron James confronted Stephen A. Smith courtside, her reaction was simple: “Good,” per TheSpun.
Following the Los Angeles Lakers’ victory over the New York Knicks, James approached Smith over comments he had made about his son, Bronny James. The exchange ignited a wave of discussion across sports media, with personalities taking sides. Hill, however, took a broader perspective, seeing value in the back-and-forth rather than choosing a camp.
In a video on her YouTube channel, Hill stated that this type of controversy benefits both sides. As a seasoned journalist, she understands that at some point, a reporter will write something that an athlete dislikes. Facing that person afterward is a natural part of the job, and in her view, it fosters accountability.
“It keeps you honest as a reporter,” she said. “You talk differently about people when you know you’ll have to see them again. I learned early on that if I wrote something controversial, I had to own it, no matter who it was about.”
This lesson, she explained, shaped her approach to covering sports. If an athlete took issue with her words, she had to be ready to stand by them in the locker room the next day. “It could be intimidating at first, but ultimately, it made me better,” she added. “You gain respect when you stand firm on your words.”
The LeBron-Smith Dynamic and Black Fatherhood
Smith’s confrontation with LeBron, however, carried different implications. While Hill saw value in journalists and athletes engaging directly, she acknowledged the personal nature of this dispute. Smith insisted his comments were never about Bronny himself, but Hill understood why James took offense.
“LeBron, given his background, has always emphasized Black fatherhood,” she said. “He didn’t have a relationship with his father, and he’s been open about making sure his kids have every opportunity possible. That’s what a father should do.”
Hill believes both sides have a right to their stance. LeBron, as a father, has every reason to defend his son. At the same time, Smith has a duty as a journalist to critique basketball players, even if they are the children of all-time greats. The issue, she noted, lies in how access to athletes has changed.
“Many teams now severely limit journalist access to players,” she explained. “I get it. No one loves facing the media, but our presence generates conversation about the league. Some players embrace it, others don’t, but it’s a key part of the sport.”
In the end, Jemele Hill’s perspective remains balanced. She recognizes the responsibilities on both sides—journalists must be prepared to stand by their words, and athletes have every right to challenge narratives about them. This dynamic, in her eyes, keeps the industry honest.
The post Jemele Hill’s ‘Black fatherhood’ take amid LeBron James, Stephen A. Smith drama appeared first on ClutchPoints.
