Black Ops 6, the latest installment in the never-ending Call of Duty franchise. You know the drill, guns, explosions, some convoluted storyline about a secret mission, and of course, the real star of the show, the operator skins.
Yeah, yeah, I hear you already. What’s wrong with skins? They look cool! And sure, nothing screams elite soldier like running around a war zone dressed as a neon-lit cyberpunk panda. But here’s the thing, while we’ve been drooling over the latest anime crossover bundle, Activision has been sitting back, feet up, sipping overpriced coffee, and laughing at us.
Why? Because they’ve figured out that they don’t need to improve gameplay. They just need to give us more ridiculous cosmetics. And we, my dear fellow gamers, have no one to blame but ourselves. The cold, hard truth is that Call of Duty used to be about tight mechanics, skillful gunplay, and intense strategy.
Now? It’s about who can spend $20 the fastest to flex a new skin on the battlefield. The moment we, as a community, decided that looking like Omni-Man was more important than demanding better map design, we lost the war.
Stop complaining about the madness you funded
Look, Activision is not your friend. They’re a business. And businesses follow the money. The more money they make from skins, the less incentive they have to fix things that actually matter. Why bother improving spawn mechanics when they can just drop another Ultra Legendary Tactical Banana Warrior bundle?
And guess what? We buy it. Every. Single. Time. We see a cool skin in the store, and suddenly, our moral compass spins out of control. Boom. Another sale for Activision. Another reason for them to ignore actual gameplay improvements.
Meanwhile, the same people who scream about skill-based matchmaking or stale gunplay are the ones first in line to purchase a glowing cyber-demon skin with built-in taunts.
More focus on skins than gameplay
byu/CallImpossible8762 inblackops6
Comment
byu/CallImpossible8762 from discussion
inblackops6
Comment
byu/CallImpossible8762 from discussion
inblackops6
Comment
byu/CallImpossible8762 from discussion
inblackops6
Comment
byu/CallImpossible8762 from discussion
inblackops6
Comment
byu/CallImpossible8762 from discussion
inblackops6
If we put half the energy we use to discuss skins into demanding better game mechanics, we might actually see change. Instead, we’re out here arguing about whether the new skeleton operator should have glowing eyes or not. Priorities, people!
How can we fix this issue about Black Ops 6
Imagine a world where we, as a united front, refuse to buy skins until Activision delivers major gameplay improvements. Imagine the panic in their boardrooms. CEOs sweating, accountants crying, developers finally given the green light to overhaul movement mechanics.
But nah, that’s never going to happen, is it? Because let’s be honest, tomorrow, Activision could drop a T-Rex operator with dual-wielding plasma rifles, and we’d all be frothing at the mouth, wallets in hand.
We’re the problem. Not Activision. They’re just smart enough to exploit our weakness, our need to look cool while getting absolutely destroyed in multiplayer. Until we stop acting like digital fashionistas and start demanding real change, we’re going to keep getting served more skins, fewer improvements, and the same old recycled maps with a fresh coat of paint.
So yeah, keep flexing your overpriced skins while your bullets ghost through enemies thanks to broken hit registration. Just don’t complain when the next Call of Duty comes out and gameplay is still the same, because you, my friend, helped make it happen.
This post belongs to FandomWire and first appeared on FandomWire
