FAMILIES of those killed and injured in the Creeslough tragedy have been refused an opportunity to speak during an appeal against an application to rebuild the petrol station at the centre of the tragedy.
It follows a decision by An Bord Pleanala to rule out a request for an oral hearing in the Co Donegal case.
The request was made to An Bord Pleanala by a number of objectors who were bereaved by the October 2022 tragedy.
Ten people died following a huge explosion at the service station in October, 2022.
The objectors include Aine Flanagan, who lost her partner Robert Garwe and five-year-old daughter Shauna Flanagan-Garwe, Shauna Gallagher, sister of the late Jessica Gallagher, Derek Martin, husband of the late Martina Martin, and Caroline Lauder and MarieLouise Macleod, sisters of the late Martin McGill.
The group, represented by human rights lawyers Phoenix Law, had argued that the level of national interest and the complexities of legal issues raised against the development warranted a full public hearing.
However, An Bord Pleanala has decided to proceed with a written determination for the appeal.
An Bord Pleanala contacted Donegal County Council to inform them of their decision.
The council then contacted members of the bereaved families informing them of the decision.
Donegal County Council said An Bord Pleanala has decided that an oral hearing is not necessary as the appeal can be adequately handled through written procedures.
Reacting to the decision, one bereaved family member said the voices of those left behind after the tragedy had once again been silenced.
The woman, who asked not to be named, said “This is a disgrace. We are not being given a chance to outline our concerns in a proper manner.
“Ten people have died and yet An Bord Pleanala do not think their lives or our hurt are important enough so we can be heard.”
In an update provided to Donegal County Council, the Board confirmed that the processing of the appeal will now continue, and the Donegal County Council Planning Department will be notified of the decision once it is made.
A number of families impacted by the tragedy have strongly objected to the building of a new business on the very site where their loved ones lost their lives.
In a separate appeal, objectors have argued that it is against public policy to rebuild a development where a mass tragedy has occurred.
They stated that inquests into the deaths of the ten victims have not yet occurred and that if the development proceeds, it will result in the destruction of crucial evidence.
