At this point, Taylor Swift has been called many things, pop icon, billionaire, songwriting genius, and even the unofficial Queen of the NFL. Candace Owens, never one to hold back her opinions, has set her sights on Swift, questioning the authenticity of her “nice girl” branding and suggesting that Swift’s hardships might be more fiction than fact.
And just when you thought this was simply another episode of “Celebrity Feud: Verbal Edition,” Owens throws in a plot twist involving none other than Blake Lively. Yes, that Blake Lively. So, buckle up, because whether you love her, loathe her, or just enjoy the drama, Candace Owens is here to challenge everything you thought you knew about Taylor Swift.
Candace Owens is not buying the nice girl act
According to Candace Owens, Taylor Swift has been playing the long game with her nice girl branding, luring fans into believing she’s just a small-town girl with big dreams. You know, the kind of person who writes heartbreak anthems, makes awkward award show speeches and sends handwritten notes to fans. But Owens? She’s not sipping the Swiftie Kool-Aid.
Owens claims that Swift’s carefully woven persona is less about reality and more about a well-executed PR strategy. In her view, Swift isn’t just a relatable songwriter, she’s a marketing genius who has spun a Cinderella-esque story out of a life that has been, well, pretty cushy from the get-go.
Her argument? Swift grew up with financial stability, attended exclusive schools, and had a clear path into the music industry thanks to well-connected parents. In Owens’ world, that doesn’t exactly scream struggle. Instead, it suggests someone who, perhaps, had to manufacture challenges to add a layer of depth to her story.
Owens isn’t just side-eyeing Taylor Swift’s entire discography, she’s calling it an exercise in artistic embellishment. And if there’s anything Owens loves more than a good political debate, it’s exposing what she perceives as media manipulation.
Candace Owens comments on Blake Lively’s lawsuit
Now, this is where things take a turn from hot take to full-blown legal thriller. According to Candace Owens, her skepticism about Blake Lively was validated when attorney Brian Freedman presented facts in the ongoing legal case. While the details of the lawsuit are still unfolding, Owens wasted no time and said,
When Brian Freedman came back with the facts, they were just undeniable and it contextualized everything. And it was really quite horrific because you just go, ‘What kind of a monster even goes through with this CRD filing and doesn’t include the proper context of these things?’
So, what’s the tea? According to Owens, The CRD filing, which Owens finds particularly damning, allegedly omits key details that would provide proper context. Owens finds this omission deeply suspicious and sees it as yet another example of calculated image control.
But let’s be real, Owens was never going to let Lively slide on anything. So, where does this leave us? Well, if you’re a Swiftie, you’re probably rolling your eyes, crafting a 500-word Twitter thread about how Candace Owens just “doesn’t get it.” If you’re a Candace Owens fan, you’re nodding along, finally feeling validated in your long-held suspicions. And if you’re just here for the drama? Congrats, you picked the right week to tune in.
This post belongs to FandomWire and first appeared on FandomWire
