Shark Tank has seen its fair share of cutthroat deals, but not every investor played purely for profit. While Kevin O’Leary crunched numbers and Barbara Corcoran hunted for business gold, one fan-favorite Shark sometimes threw cash at pitches just to make a point.
That unique approach set them apart in the Tank, making them one of the most unpredictable and beloved judges on the show. After all, sometimes the best deals weren’t just about money; they were about impact.
Mark Cuban bet on people, not just profits; Barbara Corcoran played it safer
Mark Cuban never played Shark Tank like a numbers game. While Kevin O’Leary and Barbara Corcoran weighed risks and rewards, Cuban sometimes threw money at pitches just to “send a message.”
Profit? Optional. Impact? Essential.
Barbara Corcoran, on the other hand, kept a tighter grip on her checkbook. She admitted that only one in ten of her Shark Tank investments actually made money. She joked during a podcast segment,
I’ve invested in 150 businesses, and I’ve made money on about 10%. The minute someone’s opening their mouth, I feel like I’ve got a 90% chance of losing another $100,000 here. Do I really want to listen?
That’s why she only invested in founders who felt like winners – vision over valuation.
Cuban’s approach is more hands-on, more heart-driven. He didn’t always chase the best investments but backed entrepreneurs who needed a break.
He wrote on Twitter,
I’m good with that with my ‘Shark Tank’ companies. I don’t do the show to get the best investments. And I don’t always invest because I think I’ll make money. Sometimes my deals are purely to help someone or send a message.
His hit rate? A solid one in four, proving that gut instinct sometimes pays off.
Corcoran, despite her cautious bets, swore by her strategy. Startups often had to rebuild from scratch, so investing in the right person mattered more than the initial pitch. If she guessed right, it worked. If not? No regrets. “I’d rather look forward and find somebody else,” she said.
In the Shark Tank waters, some hunted for profit. Others just wanted to make waves.
Kevin O’Leary wants DOGE to cut deeper, but at what cost?
Kevin O’Leary had a bone to pick with Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The Shark Tank investor didn’t think the cuts were happening fast enough, or going deep enough.
Since its launch under President Trump, DOGE slashed federal spending, from IRS layoffs during tax season to shuttering the CFPB. Critics feared essential programs were on the chopping block, but O’Leary wanted more. He argued,
All of these agencies are like big fat chickens dripping over barbecues of fat. If they can’t show you that they’re adding value, you whack.
But while O’Leary praised the shake-up, the question remained: Were these cuts fixing waste, or leaving everyday Americans in the dust?
Watch Shark Tank on Hulu & Apple TV.
This post belongs to FandomWire and first appeared on FandomWire
